Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575056›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2026

Comparative assessment of immunochromatographic test kits using low-molecular-weight antigens from cyst fluids of two different genotypes of Taenia solium for serodiagnosis of human cysticercosis.

Lakkhana Sadaow, Penchom Janwan, Patcharaporn Boonroumkaew, Rutchanee Rodpai, Oranuch Sanpool, Tongjit Thanchomnang, Marcello Otake Sato, Pewpan M Intapan, Hiroshi Yamasaki, Yasuhito Sako and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lakkhana SadaowMekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0462-6209
Penchom JanwanMekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Medical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80161, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7500-5848
Patcharaporn BoonroumkaewMekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5873-2392
Rutchanee RodpaiMekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Nakhonratchasima College, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0281-2101
Oranuch SanpoolMekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0451-0756
Tongjit ThanchomnangMekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2604-0281
Marcello Otake SatoDivision of Global Environment Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Niigata University of Pharmacy and Medical and Life Sciences,Niigata 956-8603, Japan.
Pewpan M IntapanMekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2138-8783
Hiroshi YamasakiDepartment of Parasitology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan Institute for Health security, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-3526
Yasuhito SakoDivision of Parasitology, Department of Infectious Diseases, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan.ORCID 0009-0003-1319-0675
Toni WandraSari Mutiara Indonesia University, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia.
Kadek SwastikaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
Wanchai MaleewongMekong Health Science Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand - Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6726-3759

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP20K08816National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT): High-Potential Research Team Grant Program N42A670561Research Program from Research and Graduate studies, Khon Kaen University (KKU) RP66-7-001Research Program on Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development Kansensho Jitsuyoka-Ippan, grant no. 23fk0108681h0901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cysticercosis is a serious zoonosis caused by infection with larvae (cysticerci) of the pork tapeworm, Taenia solium. Infection can involve the nervous system, causing chronic headache and intracranial hypertension, focal neurological deficits, epileptic seizures, and paralysis. The disease is found in developing countries, where porcine cysticercosis is prevalent and undercooked pork is habitually consumed. This study aimed to develop immunochromatography-based test (ICT) kits, using low-molecular-weight antigens purified from cyst fluids of Latin American and Asian genotypes of T. solium. To evaluate the kits, we used 164 serum samples, including 24 from proven/confirmed cysticercosis cases, 110 from cases with other parasitoses, and 30 from healthy individuals. Diagnostic performances were calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3% (95% CI [62.6-95.3]), 93.6% (95% CI [88.1-97.0]), and 92.1% (95% CI [86.8-95.7]), respectively for the American genotype-based ICT kit, while for the Asian genotype-based ICT kit, they were 87.5% (95% CI [67.6-97.3]), 98.6% (95% CI [94.9-99.8]), and 97.0% (95% CI [93.0-99.0]), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity did not significantly differ between the two ICT kits (exact McNemar's test; p > 0.05), with a concordance of 93.9%, represented by a Cohen's kappa of 0.77 (p < 0.001), indicating substantial agreement. These results indicate that affinity-purified antigens from different geographical isolates can be used for the diagnosis of human cysticercosis. The diagnostic specificities were better than for a previously reported ICT kit that used crude antigen.

Indexed as

Antigens, HelminthChromatography, AffinityCyst FluidCysticercosisReagent Kits, DiagnosticSerologic TestsTaenia soliumAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthGenotypeHumansMolecular WeightRapid Diagnostic TestsSensitivity and SpecificitySwineAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthReagent Kits, DiagnosticAntibody detectionDiagnosticsGenotypesHuman cysticercosisImmunochromatographic testTaenia solium

Identifiers

PMID41575056
PMCPMC12829318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.