ReviewMedical gas research2026
Environmental impact of anesthetic gases.
Review in Medical gas research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Climate change, pharmaceuticals and prescribing patterns: a scoping review and proposal for the MAMS model for healthcare educators.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare systems are known to negatively impact the environment, with the operating room significantly contributing to these issues. Specifically, anesthetic gases have been a recent target of many sustainability initiatives, as they are known to be greenhouse gases and have traditionally been a cornerstone of providing general anesthesia. This review focuses on the current literature regarding the impact of anesthetic gases on the environment, including common definitions such as global warming potential and carbon dioxide equivalents. The most commonly used anesthetic gases are reviewed, including their impact on the atmosphere, as well as strategies to reduce their negative impact while maintaining their availability for use in the practice of anesthesiology. Specifically, the clinical applications of the commonly used anesthetic gases, namely sevoflurane, desflurane, isoflurane and nitrous oxide are discussed. This review further identifies and explores alternative methods that help mitigate the negative environmental impact of anesthetic gases, including gas capturing systems, low flow anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia, as well as barriers to implementing these strategies. We conclude that while many strategies exist to minimize the environmental impact of anesthetic gases, implementation is often hindered by factors such as institutional buy-in and cost/return on investment ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.