ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Ultrasound Use in Anesthesiology and Intensive Care in the Nordic Countries-An International Survey on Availability, Frequency of Use, Operator Training, and Assessment.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound is increasingly used in anesthesia and intensive care medicine for procedural guidance and patient assessment. However, training and formal skills assessment vary, and there is limited knowledge about current ultrasound practices in the Nordic countries. This study aims to survey the availability, daily clinical use, and current state of ultrasound training and skills assessment among anesthesiologists across the Nordic countries. An online cross-sectional survey, designed according to the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) guidelines was distributed as a convenience sample across anesthesiology departments in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, covering a range of hospital types, including regional and university hospitals. The survey consisted of three sections: demographics, ultrasound availability, and procedural use, including skills development and assessment. Key measures included the frequency of ultrasound use, types of procedures where ultrasound was employed, training methods, self-assessed proficiency, and the frequency of formal skills assessments. An overall response rate of 38% (n = 412) was obtained. Ultrasound was used daily or weekly by 96% of respondents, and procedures where ultrasound was most frequently used were vascular access (97%) and peripheral nerve blocks (83%). Practical training was primarily acquired through clinical use under supervision from colleagues, with limited use of simulation-based training. Few respondents (27% across procedures) reported formal skills assessments, and self-assessed proficiency varied, with intermediate and beginner levels being the most common. Retention of skills was rarely assessed, with an average of 8% across procedures. Ultrasound is used almost daily by most anesthesiologists in the Nordic region, with equipment readily available in the departments. Despite its frequent use, training and skills assessments vary with limited focus on ensuring skills retention. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This article presents the results of a survey on ultrasound availability, usage and training for anesthesiologists working in the Nordic countries. Keeping in mind responder bias, the availability and usage is high, but there is a low level of reported formal training and skills assessment. This highlights a need for structured training and competency assessment for ultrasound, that could be offered via nordic collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.