ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Fundamental Insights into Nanoconfined Devices by Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoelectroanalysis with Carbon Nanopipettes Based on Prussian Blue-NiHCF for Hydrogen Peroxide Sensing.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Scan-Rate-Induced Transition from Redox to Ion Current Rectification in Carbon Nanopipettes.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) being a powerful tool to inspect phenomena that occur at different time scales, its application to nanofluidic devices remains underexplored. In this study, we investigate the electrochemical behavior of glass nanopipettes internally coated with a carbon layer (CNPs, 60 nm radius) using EIS and electrochemical capacitance spectroscopy (ECS) to decouple ion transport from redox reactions. Through systematic measurements under varied conditions, we demonstrate herein that EIS and ECS can facilitate the estimation of key parameters, such as ion and electron transfer resistances, double-layer capacitance, and redox capacitance, by employing equivalent electrical circuits. Complementary methods, i.e., the distribution of relaxation times and differential capacitance, provide consistent values of resistances and capacitances compared to equivalent circuit analysis (<5% of difference between both methods) without predefined circuit assumptions, offering further insight into time constants and CNP resistance. Moreover, we underline the effectiveness of capacitance-based analysis in detecting redox species within the CNP domain at concentrations <10 μM, suggesting significant potential for sensing applications. Also, EIS effectively monitors surface modifications in the presence of nonredox-active compounds, as demonstrated using bovine serum albumin. Thus, protein adsorption led to a slight increase of 16 mV in peak separation in voltammetry; whereas EIS displayed a significant increase in both electron transfer resistance (from 0.88 to 18.4 MΩ) and ion resistance (from 8.55 to 10.6 MΩ). Overall, our findings underscore the potential of EIS in nanoscale electrochemistry, providing a valuable platform for fundamental studies and sensor development in nanoconfined domains.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.