ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Neuromodulation of Cortical Targets in Freezing of Gait.
Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turns and Turn-Related Falls: Stepping on a Rotating Platform as a Potential Approach to Foster Adapted Muscular and Neural Plasticity in Fragile Persons and Patients with Motor Impairment.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Neuromodulation of Cortical Targets in Freezing of Gait.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FOG) is a disabling feature of Parkinson's Disease (PD) with unclear underlying pathophysiology. Evidence from multimodal neuroimaging studies suggests that complex interactions between cortical and subcortical areas may occur in FOG. While noninvasive neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), can effectively modulate large-scale networks involved in FOG, the development of noninvasive neuromodulation interventions is limited by an incomplete understanding of the interactions between underlying network disruptions and FOG behavior. Recent studies have brought into question whether observed network changes in FOG are truly causal or secondary, and if secondary, are they adaptive, maladaptive, or not related? Although these questions go beyond correlative analyses, neuromodulation approaches provide an opportunity to systematically alter networks involved in FOG, providing evidence of a causal relationship. Here, we present evidence from noninvasive neuromodulation interventions of multiple cortical targets and their effects on behavior. In an attempt to leverage prior work to shed light onto the pathophysiology of FOG, we provide specific definitions of key aspects of gait behavior. We also aim to provide a framework under which adaptive and maladaptive network changes can be interpreted and targeted for the development of neuromodulation interventions. We encourage the design of future neuromodulation studies to consider including multimodal outcomes that will expand our understanding of the relationship between FOG behavior and treatment related network changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.