ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Co-Producing a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) With and for People With Intellectual Disability.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of a Patient-Created, Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United Kingdom.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Co-Producing a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) With and for People With Intellectual Disability.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient reported experience measures (PREMs) are widely used as key indicators of value in healthcare towards improved services but are rarely applied among people with intellectual disability. Incorporating the experiences of people with intellectual disability in PREMs data is vital as this group often encounter poor healthcare access and outcomes. This study reports the coproduction of accessible PREMs for people with intellectual disability from a 3-year inclusive research project called Listen to Me.
objectiveTo coproduce a PREM suitable for people with intellectual disability.
methodCo-production occurred through inclusive data collection methods in five hybrid co-production workshops within an inclusive research project structure. Preliminary user testing of the Listen to Me PREM was conducted via semi-structured interviews using the 'think aloud' method.
resultsCo-production included two people with intellectual disability, six people who support family members with intellectual disability, three researchers and three people with experience health service management or direct care. Preliminary user testing was completed by 11 people with intellectual disability with a range of communication needs and preferences. The resulting 9-item Listen to Me PREMs are digitally-enabled tools that include accessible features, such as large font and audible options to enable completion directly by people with a range of communication approaches.
conclusionThe Listen to Me PREMs provide an innovative tool to capture patent-reported experiences directly from people with intellectual disability. By applying tools such as the Listen to Me PREMs, health services are better equipped to identify opportunities for improvement, to enhance access, quality and outcomes in health care delivery for consumers with high healthcare needs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with diverse abilities and communication preferences have been engaged both as members of the Listen to Me research team, and in all elements of data collection. The Listen to Me project has grown from a collaboration with consumers and all elements of this research engage with a diverse consumer group. The CanEngage Consumer Leadership Group (CLG) is central to all research activities including governance, data collection, analysis, preparation and dissemination of findings. The CLG has eight members, two members have intellectual disability and six are parents or siblings who support family members with intellectual disability to access health care. The CLG were involved in the design of the research proposal, reviewing and contributing to the ethics protocols, the coproduction of the Patient reported experience measure (PREM) and as authors of this paper. People who support family members with intellectual disability to access healthcare were involved in constructing and editing the paper. Two people with intellectual disability were involved in reviewing the accessible summary of the paper and provided feedback on clarity. Some authors are family members of people living with an intellectual disability. These family members are crucial advocates for people with a severe intellectual disability who do not have the capacity or capability of communicating using speech or writing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.