Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574753›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025

Exploring pharmacy provision of medication abortion pills in Nepal: a mixed-methods study of pharmacy workers' knowledge and practices.

Nished Rijal, Angel M Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nished RijalPhD Candidate, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Collaborative for Interdisciplinary Global Abortion Research, Ottawa, Canada.
Angel M FosterProfessor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Collaborative for Interdisciplinary Global Abortion Research, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8848-203X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Nepal, pharmacists are legally permitted to dispense medication abortion drugs with a prescription but provision of mifepristone/misoprostol without a prescription is prohibited. However, one in five Nepalese women seeking medication abortion pills do so directly from pharmacies. This mixed-methods study aimed to understand pharmacy workers' knowledge of and practices related to medication abortion care and the reasons behind their provision or non-provision of these pills with and without a prescription. We surveyed 489 pharmacy workers and conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 pharmacy workers in major cities in Nepal's Koshi province. Our survey findings revealed that pharmacy workers are knowledgeable about the legal status of medication abortion (

Indexed as

Abortifacient AgentsAbortion, InducedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacistsAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMifepristoneMisoprostolNepalPharmaciesPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesAbortifacient AgentsMifepristoneMisoprostolabortionmifepristonemisoprostolNepalpharmacies

Identifiers

PMID41574753
PMCPMC12931327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.