ArticleJournal of public health dentistry2026
Achieving Consensus on Oral Health in Aged Care: Findings From an Australian e-Delphi Study.
Article in Journal of public health dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmacists' role in recognising medication-related oral health risks in aged care: a qualitative study of pharmacists' and dentists' perspectives.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo establish expert consensus on the critical factors shaping implementation of oral health assessment in Australian residential aged care (RAC) using an e-Delphi approach.
methodsA modified electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) process, informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework, was conducted over two iterative survey rounds to refine expert perspectives. 60 experts were purposively sampled from oral health, aged care, policy, and implementation science. Quantitative responses were summarized with descriptive statistics, while qualitative feedback was analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsConsensus was reached on the importance of mandating oral health care in national aged care accreditation standards, embedding oral health into broader aged care policies and requiring systematic oral health assessments as part of routine care. Participants highlighted workforce shortages, insufficient training, limited practitioner access, and organizational readiness as key barriers. Enablers included workforce development, simplified and standardized assessment tools, mobile and outreach dental services, policy mandates, and cultural change recognizing oral health as integral to person-centered care. Round two resolved areas of initial uncertainty, with consensus achieved on all outstanding items.
conclusionThis study provides the first consensus-based priorities for embedding oral health assessment tools in RAC, signaling sector-wide readiness for reform. Applying the EPIS framework, the findings highlight that enforceable accreditation standards must be paired with workforce training, oral health champions, and practical tools to ensure sustainable uptake. These insights offer an evidence-informed roadmap for policymakers and service providers, reframing oral health from a peripheral task to a regulated element of clinical governance and quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.