Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574491›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2026

Comparison of wear on articular cartilage from polycarbonate-urethane and other implant biomaterials.

Maha Ead, Andrea Dimitrov, Haoyang Li, Mohammadhamed Shahsavari, Kezhou Wu, Cameron Scott, Chester Jar, Jonelle Melissa Jn Baptiste, Nadr Jomha, Kajsa Duke and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maha EadDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4647-2009
Andrea DimitrovDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Haoyang LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Mohammadhamed ShahsavariDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Kezhou WuDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Cameron ScottDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Chester JarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Jonelle Melissa Jn BaptisteDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Nadr JomhaDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Kajsa DukeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Lindsey WestoverDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Talar replacement procedures offer good clinical outcomes for patients experiencing talar osteonecrosis with collapse. However, there is a potential for cartilage wear as the artificial talus prosthesis articulates against the native articular cartilage (AC) in the ankle joint. Therefore, this study investigated the wear of AC against candidate implant biomaterials with the aim of selecting an appropriate material for use in talar replacement procedures. Cobalt chrome alloy (Co-28Cr-6Mo), titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V), ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), industrial grade natural polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and polycarbonate-urethane (PCU) were tested against porcine AC submerged in bovine serum using an in vitro customized dual-motion wear testing setup. A total of 43,200 cycles at a frequency of 3 Hz were completed for each test. Both macroscopic and microscopic analyses were used to quantify cartilage wear using the Outerbridge and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) clinical grading systems, respectively. In the macroscopic analysis, Ti-6Al-4V demonstrated the most AC wear, followed by Co-28Cr-6Mo, PEEK, UHMWPE, and PCU. In the microscopic analysis, PEEK demonstrated the most AC wear, followed by Ti-6Al-4V, Co-28Cr-6Mo, UHMWPE, and PCU. PCU demonstrated the least amount of AC wear compared to all other biomaterials and showed statistically insignificant differences with the control group (porcine cartilage-on-cartilage) in both macroscopic and microscopic inspections. These results suggest that PCU may be a suitable candidate material for coating talus implants as it demonstrated superior AC wear performance compared to the other biomaterials investigated in this study.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCartilage, ArticularMaterials TestingMechanical PhenomenaPolycarboxylate CementProstheses and ImplantsUrethaneAnimalsBenzophenonesKetonesPolymersSwineBenzophenonesBiocompatible MaterialsKetonespolycarbonatePolycarboxylate CementpolyetheretherketonePolymersUrethanearticular cartilagebiomaterialscartilage wearorthopedicspolycarbonate-urethanetalus prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID41574491
PMCPMC12901665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.