Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574409›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine2026

Infection-targeted innovations in anastomotic leak management: endoscopic advances, antimicrobial biomaterials, and precision strategies.

Yansong Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yansong XuDepartment of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a devastating complication of gastrointestinal surgery and a critical source of hospital-acquired infections. This review synthesizes recent advances in AL management, with a focus on infection-targeted strategies. A narrative review of the literature was conducted, encompassing established clinical therapies and emerging preclinical innovations. For mature endoscopic modalities, such as Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT), clinical cohort data and meta-analyses support high fistula closure rates (74-94.4%) and a significant reduction in sepsis risk. In parallel, novel preclinical strategies-including antibiotic-eluting hydrogels, reversible endoscopic bypass procedures, and artificial intelligence-driven prediction models-demonstrate transformative potential in early-stage studies but require robust clinical validation. The future management of AL is evolving towards an integrated model, combining evidence-based endoscopic interventions with intelligent biomaterial-based approaches. Translating preclinical innovations into practice will necessitate overcoming challenges related to cost, standardization, and long-term safety, ultimately enabling a paradigm shift from reactive repair to proactive, precision prevention.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakAnti-Infective AgentsCross InfectionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyPrecision MedicineAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsAnastomotic leakageantibacterial hydrogelendoscopic vacuum therapyhospital-acquired infectionsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID41574409
PMCPMC12833900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.