ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Characteristics of adverse events and clinical risks of intravenous immunoglobulin: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibody-Dependent and Antibody-Independent Hemolysis in Sickle Cell Disease.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expert consensus recommendations for the prevention and management of immunoglobulin therapy-related adverse reactions in primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: a national Delphi study from the Immunodeficiency Group of the Spanish Society of Immunology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is widely used to treat primary immunodeficiency, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, immune thrombocytopenia, and other disorders. Although effective in maintaining IgG trough levels and reducing infections, its safety profile requires further characterization. Methods: A large-scale pharmacovigilance study was conducted using the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 2004 to Q4 2024. Four disproportionality methods-reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS)-were applied to detect adverse event signals. Weibull modeling was used to assess temporal risk patterns. Results: A total of 76,138 IVIg-associated reports were identified. Common events included infusion-site reactions (swelling, erythema, pain), infections (upper respiratory tract infection, bronchitis, pneumonia, influenza, urinary tract infection), and systemic reactions (pyrexia, chills, hypersensitivity, headache, asthenia, nausea, vomiting). Several novel potential safety signals emerged, including blood pressure-related events (hypertension and hypotension), weight changes (loss and gain), and falls. Conclusion: Real-world FAERS data confirm the established tolerability of IVIg while highlighting rare but clinically important safety signals, particularly hemolytic anemia and aseptic meningitis. These findings warrant further clinical investigation to optimize monitoring and promote safer therapeutic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.