Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574376›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Developing evaluation index system for "new medicine" construction in Chinese medical schools-meta-ethnography and Delphi-AHP approach.

Dandan Zheng, Norlizah Che Hassan, Norliza Ghazali, Yuee Chai, Dan Zhang, Wanru Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dandan ZhengDepartment of Science and Technology, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Norlizah Che HassanDepartment of Foundation of Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Norliza GhazaliDepartment of Foundation of Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Yuee ChaiDepartment of Science and Technology, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Dan ZhangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Wanru LyuDepartment of Foundation of Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study intends to construct a scientific, comprehensive and operable evaluation index system for the constructing achievements of "New Medicine" in medical schools and contribute to promoting the innovative development of medical education in China. Methods: The study adopted a sequential mixed-methods design. An initial indicator system was first constructed through meta-ethnographic analysis, which was subsequently refined through two rounds of Delphi consultations by 12 experts. In the final stage, the relative weights of the indicators were quantified and validated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Results: The final evaluation index system includes 11 first-level indicators and 37 second-level indicators. Among them, the top three first-level indicators with the highest weight coefficients are the reform of the curriculum system (0.1790), the education and training of medical students (0.1550), and the optimization and adjustment of the structure of disciplines and majors (0.1530), emphasizing the fundamental role of these three in school's medical education, while the stakeholder feedback mechanism (0.0190) is used as a supplementary element. Conclusion: This study constructs an scientifically grounded evaluation index system for the development of "New Medicine" in medical schools, addressing the current lack in existing research of quantifiable measures for assessing medical innovation education in the new era. Meanwhile, it can serve as a reference for relevant researches on medical education reform, and provide evaluation benchmark for education regulatory departments, policy makers, as well as medical school administrators.

Indexed as

Delphi-AHPevaluation index systemmedical schoolsmeta-ethnographynew medicine

Identifiers

PMID41574376
PMCPMC12819698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.