Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574366›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Impact of integrating paper-based pulmonary function test case group discussions into flipped classroom on residents' COPD grading assessment competency.

Xingren Liu, Hang Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xingren LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hang LongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The flipped classroom model combined with case-based learning has emerged as a promising educational approach in medical residency training. However, the specific impact of integrating paper-based pulmonary function test case discussions on residents' ability to accurately assess COPD severity remains underexplored. Objective: To investigate the effect of incorporating paper-based pulmonary function test case group discussions within a flipped classroom framework on residents' competency in COPD grading assessment, comprehensive examination performance, and self-efficacy. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed 100 residents who completed respiratory medicine rotations between 2022 and 2024. Participants were divided into an intervention group ( Results: The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher COPD grading accuracy rates both immediately post-instruction (86.4% vs. 68.2%, Conclusion: Integrating paper-based pulmonary function test case discussions into flipped classroom teaching significantly enhances residents' COPD grading assessment competency, examination performance, and professional self-efficacy. This innovative pedagogical approach merits wider implementation in respiratory medicine residency training programs.

Indexed as

case-based discussionchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseflipped classroommedical residentspulmonary function test

Identifiers

PMID41574366
PMCPMC12819828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.