Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574357›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Efficacy of psychosensory interventions for the management of pediatric pain, fear, and distress during emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Mariela Bustamante Fernández, Line Caes, José Iván Rossel, Genesis Díaz Díaz, Gabriela Ruiz Valenzuela, Scarlett Caroca Madariaga, Nicole Klein Vallecillo, Sofía Hidalgo Vilche, Valeska Tapia Espinoza, Mariana González Zamarin and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mariela Bustamante FernándezDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Surgery, West Campus, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Line CaesDivision of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
José Iván RosselDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Surgery, West Campus, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Genesis Díaz DíazSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Gabriela Ruiz ValenzuelaSchool of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Scarlett Caroca MadariagaSchool of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Nicole Klein VallecilloSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Sofía Hidalgo VilcheSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Valeska Tapia EspinozaSchool of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Mariana González ZamarinSchool of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Katherine StrasserSchool of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experience of invasive medical procedures (IMP) in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) is often highly stressful for children and adolescents and potentially leads to short- and long-term biopsychosocial consequences. To address these challenges, psychological and sensory strategies have been developed to mitigate negative outcomes and enhance children's adaptive coping PEDs. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of psychological and sensory interventions on pediatric pain, fear, and distress during PEDs. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Results: A total of 1,796 records were retrieved (PubMed = 513, PsycInfo = 148, CINAHL = 516, SCOPUS = 183, Web of Science = 436); 45 were retained for the meta-analysis. Psychosensory interventions were grouped into seven subcategories: Somato-Sensory, Immersive Reality, Screen-Based, Toy Interaction, Social Interaction, Active Command, and Unisensory Distractions. The meta-analysis revealed significant reductions in both self-reported pain and fear ( Discussion: Both pre-procedural preparation strategies and somatosensory procedural distractions are promising approaches for managing stressful experiences in PED settings. These approaches may address the sensory, cognitive, and emotional components of procedural pain, fear and distress. The evidence obtained could inform the development of clinical protocols aimed at optimizing children' experiences in PEDs and potentially minimizing long-term psychological and somatosensory consequences. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023403583, PROSPERO CRD42023403583.

Indexed as

distressfearmeta-analysispediatric emergency departmentpediatric painpsychosensory interventionsRCT (randomised controlled trial)

Identifiers

PMID41574357
PMCPMC12819612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.