ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Comparison between metatranscriptomics and viral metagenomics, 16S, and host transcriptomics for comprehensive profiling of the respiratory microbiome and host response.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A total infectome framework for resolving complex disease etiology in aquaculture.Advanced biotechnology · 2026Article
- National Surveillance of Enterovirus D68 Upsurge, France, 2024.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Oral and plasma microbiome in the context of acute febrile illness.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Editorial: Sequencing technologies in advancing veterinary and zoonotic infection research.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Omics-based studies focusing on a single kingdom, such as bacterial 16S gene sequencing, viral metagenomics, and human mRNA sequencing, are commonly used to explore the microbiome and its association with host responses. But combining these approaches is often expensive and time-consuming. Metatranscriptomics provides a snapshot of the entire active microbiome through bulk RNA sequencing in a single test, yet its performance relative to kingdom-specific methods has not been systematically assessed. Methods: We compared metatranscriptomics with three kingdom-specific sequencing approaches in 20 nasopharyngeal aspirates from infants 7 months of age hospitalized for bronchiolitis at the Hospices Civils de Lyon. Results: Applying specific sequencing depth thresholds (≥1,000 bacterial reads, ≥100,000 human reads, and detection of an internal RNA control), metatranscriptomics showed high detection concordance and correlated abundance for RNA viruses and human coding genes. Metatranscriptomics also detected RNA from both eukaryotic and prokaryotic DNA viruses, suggesting potential for identifying transcriptional activity. For the bacteriome, 82% of genera exceeding 0.5% relative abundance were captured, revealing distinct transcriptional profiles at the species level. Metatranscriptomics reproduced multi-omics-derived host-microbiome endotypes and revealed stronger key microbial associations, particularly for transcriptionally active microorganisms. Discussion: These findings indicate that a single metatranscriptomics run can complement or replace kingdom-specific approaches for profiling RNA viruses and the host transcriptome, while also identifying transcriptionally active bacteria and DNA viruses. Low-abundance or latent microorganisms may still require targeted assays. Metatranscriptomics thus provides a cost- and time-efficient strategy for integrated microbiome research and holds promise for clinical applications in acute infections and cases of diagnostic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.