ArticleChildren and youth services review2024
Front line child welfare perspectives on the utility and implementation of intensive family preservation services.
Article in Children and youth services review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Family First Preservation Services Act (FFPSA) was passed in 2018 in part to increase use of evidence-based services among child welfare systems (CWS). As such, states have implemented new service models in order to fit legislation. The current manuscript reports on perspectives of CWS workers across one state regarding the utility of a new intensive family preservation services model. Methods: CWS personnel completed surveys (n=279) and interviews (n=17) to assess their perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of the newly implemented intensive family preservation services model. Results: Survey and interview data highlighted themes related to the importance of relationships between CWS personnel and service providers, perceived child safety under the new service provision model, and availability of services for families. Conclusion: Continued work is needed to improve cross-system collaboration between CWS and community service providers both in implementation and adoption of new service models as well as for sustainability of service models, as collaborative relationships are essential to successful service delivery and child safety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.