Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574324›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2022

Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying multiplication and subtraction performance in adults and skill development in children: A scoping review.

Macarena Suárez-Pellicioni, Jérôme Prado, James R Booth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Macarena Suárez-PellicioniDepartment of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling, University of Alabama, Alabama, USA.
Jérôme PradoLyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292 & University of Lyon, France.
James R BoothDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Neural development and disorders of math processingR01HD059177 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BOOTH, JAMES R · 2009 to 2013
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies investigating the brain correlates of arithmetic processing have either focused on a single operation (e.g., addition), or have averaged brain activation across different operations, a practice that washes away operation-specific effects. This review focuses on the processing of two fundamental operations (i.e., multiplication and subtraction), summarizes recent neuroimaging evidence on the role of the verbal and quantity mechanisms that underlie adults' performance on these operations, and covers the role of these mechanisms in explaining longitudinal gains in typically developing children. Overall, evidence supports that recruitment of verbal mechanisms is important for explaining single-digit multiplication performance and gains, whereas recruitment of quantity mechanisms is crucial for explaining performance and gains in single-digit subtraction.

Indexed as

arithmeticdevelopmentfMRImultiplicationskillsubtraction

Identifiers

PMID41574324
PMCPMC12823151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.