ArticleCureus2026
Management of Suspected Stage IVA Endometrial Cancer With Rectosigmoid Involvement Using Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Interval Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stage IVA endometrial cancer with rectosigmoid involvement is rare and presents challenges for primary surgical management due to the risk of major multivisceral resection and associated morbidity. We report the case of a 55-year-old woman who presented with prolonged postmenopausal bleeding, foul-smelling vaginal discharge, and pelvic pain. Imaging showed a large pelvic mass inseparable from the rectum and sigmoid colon. Histopathology demonstrated a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of gynaecological origin that was mismatch repair-proficient and p53 wild-type. In view of the extent of local disease and the anticipated morbidity of primary surgery, the multidisciplinary team (MDT) recommended neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The patient experienced rapid symptomatic improvement following the first cycle of NACT. Baseline cross-sectional imaging demonstrated a large pelvic mass measuring 14x10 cm, with suspected rectosigmoid involvement and suspicious pelvic lymphadenopathy. Following four cycles of chemotherapy, repeat imaging showed a marked reduction in tumour size consistent with a partial radiological response according to RECIST 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1) criteria. No progressive nodal disease was identified. In view of the favourable radiological and clinical response, minimally invasive interval surgery was planned with the primary aim of assessing disease resectability, with the intention to proceed with cytoreductive surgery only in the absence of widespread peritoneal disease. Interval laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were subsequently performed. Intraoperatively, dense fibrosis and tissue friability were encountered, consistent with chemotherapy response. There was no macroscopic peritoneal disease, and no evidence of true rectosigmoid invasion; therefore, bowel resection was not required. Final histopathology demonstrated only focal residual adenocarcinoma involving the endometrium and cervix with clear margins. The patient received one further cycle of chemotherapy postoperatively and is currently awaiting adjuvant radiotherapy. She remains symptom-free at follow-up. This case highlights the role of NACT in selected patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer, where primary surgery carries high morbidity. It demonstrates that endometrioid carcinomas can achieve meaningful clinical and pathological responses, enabling interval surgery in advanced-stage disease through careful MDT-led decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.