Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574223›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026

Functional Recovery Following Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient Utilizing Prospera Spinal Cord Stimulation System with Multiphase Stimulation.

Jamal Hasoon, Ivan Urits

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jamal HasoonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Ivan UritsDepartment of Pain Management Southcoast Health.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, particularly in patients who have failed conservative therapy or prior spine surgery. This case highlights significant pain reduction and functional recovery in a patient with severe lumbar radiculopathy and weakness following prior lumbar surgery. A 39-year-old female with multilevel disc bulges causing spinal stenosis, and chronic lumbar radiculopathy presented with severe low back and left leg pain. She had undergone lumbar decompression surgery in 2023 but continued to experience debilitating neuropathic pain despite medication management and multiple epidural steroid injections. Spine surgery reevaluation determined that no further surgery was indicated. At initial pain clinic evaluation, the patient was wheelchair bound and exhibited significant left lower extremity weakness. She underwent a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial using the Biotronik system with Multiphase Stimulation resulting in >65% pain relief and the ability to ambulate with a cane. Based on the successful trial, a permanent SCS implant was performed. Post-implantation, she maintained >70% pain improvement, progressed to independent ambulation for short distances, and reported substantial improvements in function and quality of life. This case demonstrates that SCS can offer meaningful pain reduction and functional restoration, even in patients with severe baseline disability and failed prior surgery utilizing Prospera Spinal Cord Stimulation System with Multiphase Stimulation.

Indexed as

Chronic painLumbar radiculopathyMultiphase stimulationNeuromodulationProspera SCS systemSpinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41574223
PMCPMC12823215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.