ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Accuracy of robot-assisted anterior transpedicular screws in the subaxial cervical spine: an experimental study on human specimens.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extended uses of robots in spine surgery beyond thoracolumbar pedicle screws: A narrative review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Design: Prospective study. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixation in human cervical spine specimens. Methods: A spine robotic system was used to implant thirty-six 1.2 mm Kirschner wires (K-wires) into the cervical pedicles (C4-C7) of five human specimens. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the planned trajectories with the actual K-wire positions. The Gertzbein-Robbins classification system (GRS), adapted for cervical pedicles, was used to evaluate accuracy; Grades A and B (<2 mm pedicle breach) were considered clinically acceptable. Secondary metrics included entry point and angle offsets. Results: Of the 36 K-wires implanted, nine were placed in C4 and C6, 10 in C5, and eight in C7. According to the adapted GRS, 25 placements (69.4%) were Grade A, 10 (27.8%) were Grade B, and one was Grade C, resulting in a 97.2% clinically acceptable placement rate. The mean target offset was 2.29 ± 1.72 mm, the entry offset was 2.47 ± 1.57 mm, and the angle offset was 5.67° ± 3.72°. No significant differences were observed between the left and right sides (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Robot-assisted ATPS fixation in cervical specimens achieved high accuracy with 97.2% of placements rated clinically acceptable, indicating its technical feasibility and potential utility in anterior cervical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.