Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574192›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

An adaptive fusion of composite attention convolutional neural network for polyp image segmentation.

Bojiao Jin, Yi Zhang, Qianqing Nie, Lin Qi, Wei Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bojiao JinNortheastern University, Shenyang, China.
Yi ZhangNortheastern University, Shenyang, China.
Qianqing NieNortheastern University, Shenyang, China.
Lin QiNortheastern University, Shenyang, China.
Wei QianNortheastern University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate localization and segmentation of polyp lesions in colonoscopic images are crucial for the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer and treatment planning. However, endoscopic imaging is often affected by noise interference. This includes issues like uneven illumination, mucosal reflections, and motion artifacts. To mitigate the impact of such interference on segmentation performance, it is essential to integrate multi-scale feature analysis effectively. Features at different scales capture distinct aspects of image information. Yet, existing methods typically rely on simple feature summation or concatenation. These methods lack the capability for adaptive fusion across scales. Methods: To address these limitations, this paper proposes AFCNet-an Adaptive Fusion Composite Attention Convolutional Neural Network. AFCNet is designed to improve robustness against noise interference and enhance multi-scale feature fusion for polyp segmentation. The key innovations of AFCNet include: (1) integrating depthwise separable convolution with attention mechanisms in a multi-branch architecture. This allows for the simultaneous extraction of fine details and salient features. (2) Constructing a dynamic multi-scale feature pyramid with learnable weight allocation for adaptive cross-scale fusion. Results: Extensive experiments on five public datasets (ClinicDB, Kvasir-SEG, etc.) demonstrate that AFCNet achieves state-of-the-art performance, with improvements of up to 3.73 Conclusion: AFCNet is a novel polyp segmentation network that leverages convolutional attention and adaptive multi-scale feature fusion, delivering exceptional generalization and adaptability.

Indexed as

adaptive feature fusionconvolutional attentiondepth-wise separable convolutiongating unitspolyp segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41574192
PMCPMC12819609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.