Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574170›Full record

ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2026

Arthroscopic Bone Grafting in Scaphoid Nonunion.

Jeffrey Justin Siu-Cheong Koo, Pak-Cheong Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey Justin Siu-Cheong KooDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-0425-4222
Pak-Cheong HoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Scaphoid non-union continues to be a big challenge in scaphoid fracture management. The drawbacks of conventional open techniques are damage to local vascularity and supporting ligamentous structures. The advancement of wrist arthroscopy prompted the development of arthroscopic bone grafting on scaphoid nonunion and has become the treatment of choice in many international centers nowadays. Materials and Methods: From 1997 to 2016, 111 symptomatic scaphoid nonunion and 14 delayed union cases were being operated. Description of Technique: Nonunion site was debrided through Midcarpal Radial (MCR) portal until healthy cancellous bone was uncovered. Scaphoid fragments were fixed with three Kirschner wires (K-wires) or cannulated screw percutaneously after correction of humpback and dorsal intercalated segment instability deformity. The bone defect was fully packed with autologous bone graft delivered through MCR portal. Early mobilization was initiated as early as 5 to 7 days after the operation. K-wires were removed under local anesthesia after clinical and radiological union was confirmed. Results: Bone union was achieved in 14 weeks (range 6-80) and overall union rate was 90.3%. Fourteen cases failed to achieve bone union after arterial blood gas test. Poor bleeding from the proximal scaphoid fragment resulted in a less favorable union rate of 78.8% and was the only statistically significant factor that affected the bone union. Conclusions: Arthroscopic bone grafting was a breakthrough in managing difficult scaphoid delayed and nonunion. It provides a more favorable biological environment for the nonunion to heal. This is evidenced by the high union rate and satisfactory clinical outcome.

Indexed as

arthroscopic bong graftingnonunionscaphoid fracturewrist arthroscopy

Identifiers

PMID41574170
PMCPMC12823184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.