Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574108›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2025

Advances in protein-protein interaction prediction: a deep learning perspective.

Noor Alkhateeb, Mamoun Awad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noor AlkhateebCollege of IT, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Mamoun AwadCollege of IT, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are vital for regulating various cellular functions and understanding how diseases are developed. The traditional ways to identify the PPIs are costly and time-consuming. In recent years, the disruptive advances in deep learning (DL) have transformed computational PPI prediction by enabling automatic feature extraction from protein sequences and structures. This survey presents a comprehensive analysis of DL-based models developed for PPI prediction, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), deep neural networks (DNNs), graph convolutional networks (GCNs), and ensemble architectures. The review compares their feature representations, learning strategies, and evaluation benchmarks, emphasizing their strengths and limitations in capturing complex dependencies and structural relationships. In addition, the paper elaborates on different benchmarks and biological databases that are commonly used in different experiments for performance comparison. Finally, we outline open challenges and future research directions to enhance model generalization, interpretability, and integration with biological knowledge for reliable PPI prediction.

Indexed as

artificial neural networksbioinformaticsdeep learningmachine learningprotein-protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID41574108
PMCPMC12819794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.