ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
Advances in protein-protein interaction prediction: a deep learning perspective.
Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks for gene regulatory network inference.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- MultiCausGRN: directed prior-guided graph attention model for multi-omics gene regulatory network inference.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are vital for regulating various cellular functions and understanding how diseases are developed. The traditional ways to identify the PPIs are costly and time-consuming. In recent years, the disruptive advances in deep learning (DL) have transformed computational PPI prediction by enabling automatic feature extraction from protein sequences and structures. This survey presents a comprehensive analysis of DL-based models developed for PPI prediction, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), deep neural networks (DNNs), graph convolutional networks (GCNs), and ensemble architectures. The review compares their feature representations, learning strategies, and evaluation benchmarks, emphasizing their strengths and limitations in capturing complex dependencies and structural relationships. In addition, the paper elaborates on different benchmarks and biological databases that are commonly used in different experiments for performance comparison. Finally, we outline open challenges and future research directions to enhance model generalization, interpretability, and integration with biological knowledge for reliable PPI prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.