ArticleAPL bioengineering2026
Decoding lower-limb movement attempts from electro-encephalographic signals in spinal cord injury patients.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restoring lower-limb function in patients with severe spinal cord injury (SCI) remains challenging. Spinal cord stimulation may enhance and reinstate lower-limb movements, but it is either used in open-loop control or its control depends upon residual motor functions, limiting its applicability in severely paralyzed individuals. The decoding of motor intentions from cortical signals may provide an interesting alternative in such cases. Electroencephalography (EEG) is an ideal solution since it is noninvasive and has been employed diffusely in the past to decode upper-limb movement intentions. Nonetheless, its application in lower-limb control remains underexplored. In this study, we investigated whether EEG can be used to decode lower-limb movement correlates in four SCI patients with varying injury severity during attempted left/right hip flexion or knee extension across four experimental sessions. We performed statistical analysis of event-related desynchronization/synchronization and machine learning classification to evaluate single and multi-window decoding performance. Our results suggest that EEG signals can often differentiate lower-limb movement attempts from rest, whereas decoding of left vs right and hip vs knee movements was more elusive. Left vs right decoding accuracy was improved through multi-window decoding, showing multiple sessions with above-chance results. In one patient, it was possible to attain above-chance three-class decoding (left/right/rest). Discriminating hip and knee movements proved more challenging. These findings establish a baseline for EEG decoding of lower-limb motor attempts in severely paralyzed individuals and pave the way for the development of brain-controlled neuroprosthetic systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.