Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574064›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

From believing to behaving: Unpacking teacher emotion as the mediator between information literacy self-efficacy and information-empowered teaching engagement.

Xinfeng Xie, Chuyi Du, Jing Cheng, Haiyan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinfeng XieSchool of Foreign Languages, Jimei University, Xiamen, China.
Chuyi DuSchool of Foreign Languages, Jimei University, Xiamen, China.
Jing ChengSchool of Arts and Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Haiyan ZhangSchool of Foreign Languages, Jimei University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the era of artificial intelligence, information literacy is a crucial skill for teachers, enabling the effective integration of technology into pedagogy. This study examines the psychological factors influencing the information-empowered teaching engagement of university English teachers. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 224 university English teachers in Southeast China. Data were collected using a composite questionnaire measuring information literacy self-efficacy, teacher emotion (both positive and negative), and information-empowered teaching engagement. The data were analyzed via SmartPLS to test the proposed mediation model. Results: The findings indicate that university English teachers experience a mix of positive and negative emotions when applying information technology. Information literacy self-efficacy was identified as a primary factor promoting teaching engagement. Both positive and negative emotions were found to play substantial and parallel mediating roles between self-efficacy and engagement. Discussion: The study highlights the complex emotional landscape accompanying technology integration. It proposes the design of hybrid professional development programs for technology-rich environments. These programs should concurrently provide emotional support and technical training to enhance teachers' information literacy self-efficacy and, consequently, their information-empowered teaching engagement.

Indexed as

information literacyparallel mediationself-efficacyteacher emotionsteaching engagement

Identifiers

PMID41574064
PMCPMC12819628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.