ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
From haemodynamics to kidney risk: AI-based early prediction validated in general and burn ICU populations.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and severe complication in critically ill patients with cardiovascular instability. Current risk scores rely on delayed renal biomarkers such as serum creatinine (sCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). We aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models predicting AKI and major adverse kidney events (MAKE) exclusively from systemic physiological and haemodynamic data. Methods and results: Two ML models were trained on the MIMIC-IV database: one including (sCr+/BUN+) and one excluding (sCr-/BUN-) renal parameters. External validation was performed in the eICU database and in a cohort of burn ICU patients from AP-HP. Model performance was assessed for early AKI and MAKE prediction up to 100 h before diagnosis. Systemic haemodynamic and physiological variables were the strongest predictors of AKI. In MIMIC-IV, the sCr-/BUN- model achieved auROC 0.78 at 72 h, approaching the sCr+/BUN+ model. In eICU, it outperformed the biomarker-based model at later time points (auROC 0.73). In the burn ICU cohort-representing a high-stress systemic environment-it maintained robust accuracy (auROC 0.75 at 24 h, 0.77 at 72 h). For MAKE prediction, the sCr-/BUN- model achieved auROC 0.87 (burn cohort), 0.67 (eICU), and 0.77 (MIMIC-IV). Median lead time for AKI prediction exceeded 70 h. Conclusion: AI models based solely on non-renal parameters can accurately predict AKI and MAKE, even under extreme systemic stress such as severe burns. Haemodynamic signatures carry sufficient information to anticipate kidney dysfunction well in advance, opening the way to real-time, proactive cardio-renal risk stratification in ICU patients with acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and after cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.