ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
A pipeline for developing deep learning prognostic prediction models in cardiac magnetic resonance image analysis.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients and healthcare professionals require clinical prediction models to accurately guide healthcare decisions, although an awareness of the limitations of regression-based models has recently increased. Deep learning (DL) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional regression-based models, due to its ability to effectively analyse heterogeneous types of data, ranging from numerical variables to medical images. Building a DL model presents various challenges, including conceptualizing the clinical problem, selecting appropriate variables and model architecture, and providing explainability. We propose a four-step pipeline for developing DL-based prediction models for cardiac magnetic resonance image analysis. This framework aims to support researchers in exploring DL application across the broad spectrum of cardiology, with a specific focus on advancement in arrhythmic risk prediction. The field of cardiomyopathy faces challenges when assessing arrhythmic risk due to the low accuracy of the current prediction models. Research efforts have focused on developing DL models able to predict major arrhythmic events in dilated cardiomyopathy. While the initial results are promising, further tests are needed before translating these models into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.