ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Impact of left-heart myopathy on mitral valve stenosis assessment and interventional outcomes: an
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Specific Analysis of Ventricular Vortex Formation and Flow Energetics in Rheumatic and Calcific Mitral Stenosis.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Pearls and pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of mitral annular calcification.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2026Article
- Continuous-wave Doppler interrogation in valvular heart disease: pearls and pitfalls.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: The shift in mitral stenosis (MS) aetiology from rheumatic to calcific valve disease complicates distinguishing valve-related from myocardial-driven haemodynamic abnormalities. This study examines how left-heart myopathy influences flow velocity-based echocardiographic MS severity assessment and evaluates haemodynamic changes following mitral valve (MV) intervention at rest and during exercise. Methods and results: The CircAdapt biophysical model was used to create a virtual cohort with varying MS severity, left ventricular (LV) compliance, and left atrial (LA) function. Mean gradient (MG) was evaluated alongside left-heart pressures at rest and during exercise. To study acute haemodynamic effects of MV intervention, the mitral valve's effective orifice area was restored to 5.9 cm². MG showed variation of 1 mmHg attributable to left-heart myopathy. Following virtual MV intervention for clinically significant MS, mean left atrial pressure (mLAP) decreased by 50% in patients with preserved myocardial function but remained elevated in those with LV and LA dysfunction due to persistently elevated LV end-diastolic pressure, resulting in persistently impaired exercise capacity. Conclusion: Virtual patient cohorts suggest that MV intervention reduces MG but may not normalize mLAP in patients with impaired LV and LA function. Persistent myocardial dysfunction may limit both symptomatic and exercise capacity improvement, despite successful intervention. As percutaneous treatment options expand, distinguishing myocardial from valve-driven abnormalities is essential for accurate assessment, patient selection, and optimizing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.