ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Development and validation of heart-healthy dietary educational material (HHDEM) for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) poses a significant global health burden. The adoption of healthy dietary behaviors is vital for the secondary prevention of CAD. However, there is limited availability of dietary educational materials tailored for patients with CAD, particularly in Malaysia, to support this process. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate dietary educational material for the secondary prevention of CAD. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study employed a design and developmental research methodology conducted in three phases. Phase I focused on content analysis. Phase II centered on the design and development of the educational material, and Phase III involved evaluating its content and face validity through feedback from experts and intended users. Content Validity Index (CVI) scores of 0.80 or higher were considered acceptable for content validity, while face validity was established with at least 75% positive responses for each item.
resultsThe heart-healthy dietary educational material (HHDEM) was developed as dietary educational material for the secondary prevention of CAD. It achieved Item-level CVI scores ranging from 0.89 to 1.00 and an overall Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI/AVE) of 0.98, demonstrating strong content validity. For face validity, there was a high level of agreement between experts and intended users across all components, with percentages ranging from 90.0% to 92.6%. These results indicate that HHDEM meets the desired standards for use by patients with CAD.
conclusionThe dietary educational material, HHDEM, designed for patients with CAD, illustrated excellent content and face validity. HHDEM has the potential to serve as a comprehensive resource for adopting healthy dietary patterns to prevent secondary CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.