Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41574016›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025

Knowledge and awareness of E-Cigarettes among 18-24 years young adult's in Chennai - A pilot E-Survey.

K P Indumathi, S Sibyl, G Krishnaprakash, Manikandan Gunasekaran, Ajay M George, R K Gabriel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K P IndumathiDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
S SibylDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
G KrishnaprakashDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
Manikandan GunasekaranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shri Sathya Sai Institute of Medical College and Research Institute, Shri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, Ammapettai, Thiruporur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ajay M GeorgeDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
R K GabrielDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe electronic cigarette, or e-cigarette, has transformed the tobacco industry in recent decades and is widely seen as a safe substitute for traditional cigarettes. Globally, young people's use of electronic cigarettes that provide nicotine has increased significantly. Adolescents who use electronic cigarettes are vulnerable to social and environmental factors in addition to physical dependence. The study aims to investigate young adults' awareness, perceptions, and use of e-cigarettes to inform the development of interventions and educational campaigns targeting potential health risks associated with these devices. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among individuals aged 18 to 24 in Chennai. An e-invitation to participate in the study was distributed via social media (Facebook, WhatsApp). The study included those in Chennai between the ages of 18 and 24, as well as volunteers to complete the questionnaire. The simple random sampling method was used. A web-based questionnaire study was conducted in online; 333 respondents were included. The questionnaire comprised three sections, the first of which contains sociodemographic information, the second section on awareness of e-cigarettes, and the third section on knowledge of e-cigarettes. The questionnaire was pilot-tested on five subjects, and suggestions from study experts were incorporated. Data were analysed using Minitab Version 21 (Minitab, LLC, State college, PA) statistical software. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data. Since the data were categorical, Chi-square test was used to find the association between variables in the study.

resultsAbout 63.3% of respondents had tobacco prevention programs conducted at their colleges, 90.1% of respondents had not used e-cigarettes, 20.5% were aware of the programs and resources available to quit smoking and vaping, and 45.8% of respondents had knowledge of cancer associated with the use of an e-cigarette.

conclusionsThe findings reveal a significant disparity in awareness between the two regions, with Chennai demonstrating higher levels of understanding than Chengalpattu where the majority of respondents in both areas were not users of e-cigarettes.

Indexed as

Awareness of E-cigaretteE-cigaretteelectronic cigaretteE-surveyknowledge of E-cigarette

Identifiers

PMID41574016
PMCPMC12822859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.