ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025
Bibliometric analysis of scientific research on early obstetric warning system.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maternal mortality continues to pose a significant public health challenge, and the obstetric early warning system (EOWS) represents a critical strategy to reduce maternal deaths. Therefore, monitoring the advancement of relevant research and development trends is vital. The study aimed to measure the authors' nation, subject areas, growth trends, and thematic research to describe published articles on EOWS. A retrospective bibliometric analysis and descriptive statistics were applied. We retrieved published articles from 2000 to 2024 using the Scopus database. We screened the abstracts and titles for eligibility. Eligible papers were further reviewed using co-occurrence analysis. The data were categorized and visualized using VOS viewer software (version 1.6.17, Java version 1.8.0_333 Oracle Corporation). A total of 126 articles were relevant and included in the review. The countries that produced the most publications were the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). The most relevant subjects were medicine and nursing. Four clusters emerged, reflecting the main topics, including maternal mortality, scoring system, hospitalization, and pregnant women. Current research terms included sequential organ failure assessment, electronic health records, length of stay, and oxygen therapy. This study suggests the need for further research on topics, such as "electronic medical record, primary health services, psychology, and cost-effectiveness" in relation to EOWS. Furthermore, this study encourages investigators and policymakers in the field of maternal health to expand their focus and explore interdisciplinary theories and approaches to address key issues in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.