ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Validation of the Brief Resilience Scale among Romanian healthcare workers.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) is a frequently used instrument for assessing resilience. However, its psychometric properties have been less studied among employees who care for people with disabilities. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study aims to examine the structural validity and measure gender invariance in a Romanian sample of healthcare workers from residence centers for people with disabilities (Mean
resultsThe two-factor uncorrelated structure model of the BRS demonstrated the best-fit indices (χ²/df = 2.26; CFI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.064; SRMR = 0.017) and the gender invariance (ΔCFI < 0.01). The model suggests that BRS has two distinct dimensions of resilience that do not interact directly. The internal consistency shows adequate levels (the values of α and ω are between 0.74 and 0.79). Both BRS factors correlate significantly negatively with the dimensions from DASS21-R.
conclusionsThe psychometric properties of the BRS support its applicability for assessing resilience in Romanian healthcare workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.