ArticleMachine learning. Health2026
Detecting cognitive impairment and psychological well-being among older adults.
Article in Machine learning. Health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aging society urgently requires scalable methods to monitor cognitive decline and identify social and psychological factors indicative of dementia risk in older adults. Our machine learning models captured facial, acoustic, linguistic, and cardiovascular features from 39 older adults with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment, derived from remote video conversations and quantified their cognitive status, social isolation, neuroticism, and psychological well-being. Our model could distinguish Clinical Dementia Rating Scale of 0.5 (vs 0) with 0.77 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), social isolation with 0.74 AUC, social satisfaction with 0.75 AUC, psychological well-being with 0.72 AUC, and negative affect with 0.74 AUC. Our feature importance analysis showed that speech and language patterns were useful for quantifying cognitive impairment, whereas facial expressions and cardiovascular patterns were useful for quantifying social and psychological well-being. Our bias analysis showed that the best-performing models for quantifying psychological well-being and cognitive states in older adults exhibited significant biases concerning their age, sex, disease condition, and education levels. Our comprehensive analysis shows the feasibility of monitoring the cognitive and psychological health of older adults, as well as the need for collecting large-scale interview datasets of older adults to benefit from the latest advances in deep learning technologies to develop generalizable models across older adults with diverse demographic backgrounds and disease conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.