ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Weakest link epistasis and the geometry of genetic load.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Because natural selection must optimise multiple traits at once, previous work has suggested that phenotypic dimensionality can substantially worsen the equilibrium fitness defect of a population relative to the phenotypic optimum. However, it remains unclear how conclusions drawn from classical theoretical phenotype-fitness maps extend to models grounded in explicit biological mechanisms. Here we introduce weakest-link epistasis (WLE), a framework in which fitness is determined by the least-fit phenotypic component, an extreme form of diminishing returns epistasis. We show that in this framework, increasing dimensionality amplifies the load in a manner comparable to, but surprisingly not more than, Fisher's geometric model (FGM). Building on this similarity, we demonstrate why genetic load is often invariant across different rules for combining trait-specific fitness components into an overall organismal fitness. We explore these ideas by considering the family of models where the organismal fitness is determined based on the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.