ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Evaluating the effects of CD8/CD4 on T cell function in terms of TCR-pMHC-coreceptor catch and slip bonds.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: T cells interact with peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) via the T cell receptor (TCR) and coreceptor CD4 or CD8 depending on the MHC class. These interactions form catch and slip bonds depending on the pMHC activity. Coreceptors and bond profiles impact TCR triggering and antigen discrimination. Methods: Built upon our recent correlative analysis of TCR-pMHC catch bond with T cell function, we analyzed 26 pairs of T-cell-pMHC interactions to compare the correlations of their biophysical metrics with antigen-induced T cell responses in two situations: when the coreceptor is prevented vs permitted to bind pMHC. Results: We found that the force-based metrics of TCR bond with pMHC perform better than parameters measured in the absence of force either in situ at the T cell membrane or in fluid phase using purified ectodomain proteins as predictors of T cell activation and thymocyte selection in both cases when the contributions of coreceptors are absent and present. Moreover, CD8 or CD4 co-engagement with pMHC systematically increases these metrics and increases TCR sensitivity and specificity, indicating coreceptor-mediated amplification of, or conversion to, catch-bonds that enhances mechanical tuning of TCR responses. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of force in antigen recognition by the TCR and reveal that parameters derived from the bond profile, especially in the presence of coreceptor, are more informative predictors of T cell activation compared to conventional affinity-based measurements. These results offer mechanistic insights into the roles of catch bonds and coreceptors in TCR antigen recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.