Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573879›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

BIOMECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PORCINE LOWER LIMB ARTERIES FOR PRECLINICAL EVALUATION OF PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DEVICES.

Barbara Batista de Oliveira, Frazer Heinis, Anastasia Desyatova, Jason MacTaggart, Alexey Kamenskiy

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara Batista de Oliveira
Frazer Heinis
Anastasia Desyatova
Jason MacTaggart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) predominantly affects the lower extremities, where complex biomechanical deformations during limb flexion contribute to disease progression and treatment failure. While human and cadaver studies have characterized these deformations, preclinical device testing requires large-animal models that replicate human arterial anatomy and biomechanics. Swine are commonly used, yet their biomechanical comparability to humans remains poorly defined. Methods: We performed a detailed morphometric and biomechanical analysis of the external iliac (EIA), superficial femoral (SFA), and popliteal (PA) arteries in 20 Yucatan and 16 domestic swine using computed tomography angiography. Arteries were evaluated in straight and flexed limb postures to assess diameters, lengths, axial compression, tortuosity, bending angles, and inscribed sphere radii. Breed-specific effects of age and weight were also analyzed. Results: Porcine arterial dimensions closely matched human lower extremity vessels. EIA diameters (4.9-7.2 mm) corresponded to human SFA, porcine SFA (4.1-5.9 mm) approximated human PA, and porcine PA (3.0-4.7 mm) resembled human tibial arteries. Segment lengths supported use of multiple devices. Flexion induced 12-33% axial compression, mimicking worst-case human scenarios. Tortuosity increased distally, and bending characteristics in porcine PAs aligned with human data. In Yucatan swine, vessel diameters were stable with age and weight, while domestic swine exhibited greater variability. Flexion-induced compression and tortuosity were not influenced by age or weight. Conclusion: Swine are well-suited for modeling the geometry and biomechanics of human lower extremity arteries. Their anatomical compatibility and ability to replicate physiologic deformations make them valuable models for preclinical testing of PAD therapies and vascular devices.

Identifiers

PMID41573879
PMCPMC12822727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.