ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Precision dentistry in preclinical education: analytic rubrics for enhanced objectivity in metal-ceramic crown preparations.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validity and Reliability of Rubrics for Assessment of Preclinical Orthodontic Practices in Dental Students.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Assessing the reliability and validity of a standardized rubric for staff evaluation of all-ceramic crown preparations at preclinical setting.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Preclinical dental training requires students to master precise tooth preparation skills that directly influence clinical success. Traditional grading methods often lack objectivity and consistency. Analytic rubrics, by deconstructing complex procedures into measurable components, may improve reliability and feedback in preclinical assessment. This study evaluated the application of an analytic rubric system for assessing anterior metal-ceramic crown preparations performed by undergraduate dental students. Methods: A cross-sectional, double-blind study was conducted among fourth-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery students at King Khalid University. Forty-five students prepared the maxillary right central incisor for a metal-ceramic crown under standardized conditions. Preparations were independently evaluated by four calibrated prosthodontists using an analytic rubric comprising eight criteria, each scored on a 0-1 scale. Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and Results: The overall mean score across examiners was 3.436 ± 0.522. Among the parameters, incisal reduction (57.5%) and degree of taper (61.8%) recorded the lowest scores, while finish line form (76.9%) and gingival protection (76.4%) showed the highest. ANOVA indicated no significant differences among the four examiners across all parameters ( Conclusion: The analytic rubric proved to be a reliable and transparent tool for evaluating preclinical crown preparations, minimizing examiner subjectivity and enhancing feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.