Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573798›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer: a prospective cohort study of 92,777 women from the UK Biobank.

Ke Yi, Yuke Wu, Dan Liu, Kunyan Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ke YiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuke WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dan LiuKey Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.
Kunyan ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The association between three beverage types-sugar-sweetened, artificially sweetened, and natural juices-and the incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) in a large cohort of women, given that this association is not yet fully understood. Methods: We conducted a prospective, population-based cohort study using data from 92,777 women in the UK Biobank with a median follow-up of 13.3 years. Cox proportional hazards regression and substitution analyses were used to evaluate the associations. Results: During follow-up, 682 new cases of EC were recorded. Higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) was significantly associated with an increased EC risk (HR 1.29 for >1 unit/day vs. non-consumers, P for trend = 0.004), while no statistically significant associations were found for artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) or natural juices. Replacing SSBs with ASBs or natural juices was associated with a 12 and 9% reduction in EC risk, respectively, and body mass index (BMI) was found to mediate 18.2% of the association. Conclusion: In conclusion, higher consumption of SSBs is linked to an increased risk of EC, and substituting these drinks may help reduce this risk, highlighting the role of dietary choices in EC prevention.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsSugar-Sweetened BeveragesAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited Kingdomdietary sugarsfruit and vegetable juicesnon-nutritive sweetenersprospective studiesuterine neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID41573798
PMCPMC12819223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.