ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Determinants of perceived beneficial impact of a community-university partnership in an urban environment: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community-University Partnerships (CUP) worldwide are a growing field in the collaboration between academia and local communities. In Greece, the University of West Attica, the second largest university in the metropolitan area of Athens, shapes pioneering CUP initiatives. The aim of the present study is to examine potential determinants of perceived beneficial impact of a CUP between the University and the local community in the urban setting. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 581 residents of the Egaleo municipality in the urban agglomeration of Athens, where the University is located (63.9% females). The perceived benefits of the CUP, on various life aspects of the community, were measured by a score derived from a previously validated self-administered 13-item questionnaire which recorded information on various potential determinants, such as sociodemographic and lifestyle variables, awareness and use of municipal and health services as well as evaluation of municipality services. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Results: The median CUP benefits score was 35 (IQR: 30-39). Higher CUP scores, after adjustment for gender, age, and employment status, were significantly associated with higher educational attainment (adjusted OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.10-2.29; Conclusion: Findings highlight the importance of education attainment, regular engagement in environmentally friendly practices-such as recycling-and awareness/utilization of municipal services and facilities in shaping positive community perceptions toward CUP initiatives. These results also emphasize the need for targeted outreach to less educated and disadvantaged groups within the community, to promote health equity, strengthen community involvement, and the long-term sustainability of CUP initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.