ArticleDEN open2026
Successful Endoscopic Removal and Closure of a Large Esophageal Perforation Following Accidental Ingestion of a Dental Prosthesis.
Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic removal of accidentally ingested dental prostheses can be challenging as their irregular shapes can occasionally cause severe complications, such as gastrointestinal perforation. Here, we present the case of an older woman who was referred to our hospital following accidental ingestion of a bridge-type denture. Computed tomography revealed that the denture was lodged in the thoracic esophagus, with concurrent mediastinal emphysema. Endoscopic examination confirmed that the denture had penetrated the esophageal wall. Under general anesthesia, the denture was endoscopically removed using dual endoscopes, and a large esophageal perforation was closed with an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) and subsequently reinforced with Mantis clips. Although follow-up endoscopy 1 month later demonstrated remaining OTSC at the site of the esophageal perforation, 3-month follow-up endoscopy confirmed complete closure of the perforation. Overall, this case indicates the usefulness of the dual-endoscope approach for foreign-object removal and the OTSC system for closure of esophageal perforations, thus providing the chance of avoiding invasive treatment such as esophagectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.