ArticleWestern Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR
School outbreak of coxsackievirus A16 in Antipolo City, Philippines, October 2022.
Article in Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: An investigation team was deployed to determine the cause of an outbreak of a cluster of cases of fever and rash in a public elementary school in Antipolo City, Philippines, after the Public Health Unit was notified on 24 October 2022. The team also aimed to identify the source of the outbreak and to guide prevention measures. Methods: Active case-finding for hand, foot and mouth disease was conducted at the school. A suspected case was defined as any learner who developed acute febrile illness with a papulovesicular rash on the palms and soles of the feet during 16-30 October 2022. Interviews with key informants were conducted and included school staff and parents. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Results: Nineteen suspected cases of hand, foot and mouth disease were detected, predominantly in grade 1 learners (16, 84%). Most cases (14, 74%) were 6 years old, and just over half were male (11, 58%). The first case occurred in a 6-year-old in grade 1 who attended class with a papulovesicular rash. Twelve learners (63%) from the same section developed symptoms, two of whom were seatmates of the first case. Two out of the 10 swabs collected were tested by PCR, both of which were positive for coxsackievirus A16. Discussion: The causative agent of this outbreak was identified as coxsackievirus A16. Disease transmission occurred through close contact with the index case and possibly through shared classroom objects. Follow-up actions included dissemination of a memorandum about preventing the disease to all public elementary and secondary schools that emphasized symptom screening (i.e. for fever and rash), self-isolation at the onset of symptoms, regular disinfection of classroom surfaces and regular handwashing, especially before and after eating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.