ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Case Report: Giant uterine broad ligament fibroid.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Giant uterine leiomyoma successfully managed by surgical excision: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant uterine fibroids that arise shortly after cesarean section are a rare and distinctive clinical entity. In this research, a retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data of a particular patient with such giant uterine fibroids who was admitted to Hangzhou Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. What made this case remarkable was that the patient quickly developed symptoms of pelvic and abdominal compression in the period following cesarean section. Imaging examinations disclosed a giant tumor located in the right broad ligament area. Moreover, there was extensive adhesion among the surrounding tissues and the anatomical structure was in disarray, which underlined the complexity of the condition. During the surgical treatment process, a combination of sharp separation and blunt dissection techniques was utilized. In addition, precise management of blood vessels and strategies for protecting important organs were also implemented. Ultimately, the tumor was successfully and completely removed. Postoperative pathology results confirmed that it was a uterine leiomyoma with edematous degeneration. The patient recovered smoothly after the surgery without experiencing any serious complications. Furthermore, no recurrence of the tumor was noticed during the follow-up period. In general, given the rarity, rapid progression, and intricate anatomical connections of giant uterine fibroids after cesarean section, it is of crucial importance to conduct preoperative multimodal imaging evaluations. These evaluations can help clarify the scope of the tumor as well as its adjacent relationships. Besides, during the operation, attaching great importance to adhesion separation techniques and taking good care of important blood vessels and organs, along with the implementation of individualized surgical plans, can remarkably improve the safety and effectiveness of the treatment for these tough and uncommon cases. Meanwhile, taking the clinical diagnosis and management of pregnancy complicated with giant broad ligament fibroids as an entry point, this study systematically demonstrates the clinical advantages and technical feasibility of concurrent myomectomy during cesarean section through the analysis of surgical strategies, operational details, and long-term follow-up data of a typical case. It is intended to provide evidence-based references for individualized clinical decision-making in similar cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.