ArticleNEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery2023
A Community Partnership to Reduce Food Insecurity and Improve Patient-Reported Depression.
Article in NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clarifying the Association Between Food Insecurity and Chronic Disease: Why Methods Matter.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
- Meals that heal: a randomized controlled trial testing the feasibility of commercial meal delivery as a convenient dietary intervention for depression.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of Text Message Reminders on Attendance at a Health Center-Based Produce Market: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Food as medicine, community as medicine: Mental health effects of a social care intervention.Health services research · 2025Article
- A community-engaged implementation mapping approach to increase SNAP participation in a diverse Latine community.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Factors Associated With Uptake of an Open Access Health Center-Based Mobile Produce Market: A Case for Expanded Eligibility.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2024Article
- Selecting patient-reported outcome measures: "what" and "for whom".Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Food Insecurity and Social Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Welfare State Regimes in 19 Countries.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the growing prevalence of food insecurity and its adverse effects on health, health care organizations are partnering with community organizations to develop nutrition programs aimed at both reducing hunger and improving diet-related health. Although there has been little effort to document improvements in mental health outcomes among nutrition program recipients who receive support through a community-health care partnership, this study suggests a beneficial relationship. The Greater Boston Food Bank, a 501(c)3 organization that supplies food pantries and tracks food insecurity throughout eastern Massachusetts, has developed a mobile market (MM) intervention in partnership with community health centers (CHCs) and other community-based locations to provide free produce, dairy, and high-protein food to low-income residents of eastern Massachusetts in a farmers' market-style environment, with the primary goal to reduce food insecurity. The data collected through the CHC partnership indicate that attendance at the MM was associated with improvement in depression score among CHC patients. All MM attendees experienced improvement in depression score with increased MM utilization, but the biggest effect was for patients with a diagnosis of depression at baseline. This partnership experience demonstrates that interventions developed by health care-community partnerships may have benefits for program participants beyond the primary goal of the program. During the study period of more than 3 years, for all patients in the study, each MM visit was associated with a 0.05-point decrease in the subsequent nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.08 to -0.02), which is a measure of depression on a scale of 0 to 27. Among those who had a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression before the MM intervention (PHQ-9 higher than 9), each MM visit was associated with a 0.27-point decrease in the subsequent PHQ-9 score (95% CI, -0.33 to -0.20). Mean attendance at the MM for patients with a diagnosis of depression was 6.7 visits, which translates to a predicted 1.8-point reduction in PHQ-9 score per patient during the study period.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.