Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573606›Full record

ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2025

Evaluation of Our Paediatric Patients Hospitalised with Covid-19 Diagnosis: Single Centre Experience.

Emre Aygun, Ayse Sahin, Nazan Dalgic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emre AygunDepartment of Pediatrics, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ayse SahinDepartment of Pediatrics, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Nazan DalgicDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We analyses separate age groups for in-hospital COVID pediatric patients clinical symptoms, lab tests, and treatment efforts. We also wanted to see if having another illness or a patient's nutritional condition could change the way the disease unfolds. Methods: Between July 2020 and September 2021, 90 pediatric patients (aged 1 month-18 years) with positive PCR and/or antibody tests who were hospitalised in our hospital were included in the study. Patients were classified according to age groups (0-2, 2-5, 5-12, >12 years), disease severity and presence of comorbidities. Demographic characteristics, clinical findings, laboratory parameters and radiological imaging were evaluated. Results: The disease had a mild course in 73.3% of the patients with a mean age of 87 months. In the youngest age group (0-2 years), fever (53.3%) and respiratory distress (26.7%) were more common and hospital stay was longer (median 7 days). Comorbidity rate (47.4%) was significantly higher in the moderate to severe disease group (p<0.001). The rates of elevated CRP (54.5%) and pathological chest radiography (36.4%) were higher in obese children. Recovery time was significantly longer in comorbid patients (7.3±2.4 days). Conclusion: Our study suggests that COVID-19 does not affect all children in the same way-it appears to vary notably with age. In our observations, younger children and those with existing health conditions seem to require a bit more care and close monitoring to ensure the best outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical featurescomorbiditieshospitalisation outcomesnutritional statusPaediatric COVID-19

Identifiers

PMID41573606
PMCPMC12821145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.