ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2025
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Do Patients Admitted During On-Hours Exhibit Better Results?
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has revolutionized stroke care over the past decade. Thus, we aimed to assess whether presenting during off-hours affects workflow times, clinical outcomes, and mortality of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing MT at our center and, if there is an impact, to identify areas for improvement in the treatment of acute stroke. Methods: A total of 263 consecutive patients who underwent MT between January 2020 and April 2023 were included in the study. The patients were categorized into two groups: those who presented during on-hours (Group 1) and those who presented during off-hours (Group 2). Results: Among the 263 patients enrolled in the study (131 men and 132 women; mean age: 69.49±12.22 years; age range: 25-95 years), 74 (28.14%) were admitted to the hospital during on-hours, and 189 (71.86%) were admitted during off-hours. Of these patients, 30 (40.54%) and 68 (35.98%) from Groups 1 and 2, respectively, had good outcomes in the third month. The groups showed similar demographics, treatment-related characteristics, and outcomes, with no significant differences detected. The only notable difference was that the percentage of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) was notably greater in the off-hours group (p=0.044). Conclusion: The results indicate that MT performed on patients presenting during off-hours yielded similar workflow times, successful recanalization, and clinical outcomes to MT performed on patients presenting during on-hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.