ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
m-EASIX (better than EASIX) predicts severe CAR T-cell toxicities, worse overall survival, and discriminates cytokine release syndrome from sepsis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of the Modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (m-EASIX) for 90-Day Mortality in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Hypercalcemia of Malignancy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Academic BCMA CAR-T (ARI0002h) achieves MRD-negative remission with sBCMA biomarker response in relapsed POEMS syndrome after double ASCT.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Dynamic Assessment of Modified EASIX (m-EASIX) at 48 Hours Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Critical complications in cancer patients admitted to the ICU in the era of immunotherapy: recognition, differential diagnosis, and management.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) are life-threatening complications that often arise after CAR T-cell immunotherapy. Endothelial dysfunction is believed to play a central role in their development, leading to the interest in biomarker-based tools for diagnosis and differentiating these toxicities from sepsis. This study aimed to evaluate the Endothelial Activation Stress Index (EASIX) and its modified version (m-EASIX, which replaces creatinine with C-reactive protein [CRP] (mg/dL)) as early predictors of severe CRS and ICANS, as well as tools to distinguish CRS from sepsis. Methods: One hundred and nineteen patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy for CD19-positive hematologic malignancies (n=94) or multiple myeloma (n=23) were included. EASIX and m-EASIX scores were measured at various time points: before CAR T-cell infusion, 24-48 hours post-infusion, at CRS or ICANS onset, and after treatment for each toxicity. A comparator group of 129 sepsis patients, including 86 with hematologic malignancies, was also analyzed. Results: Both EASIX and m-EASIX correlated with biomarkers of endotheliopathy, with m-EASIX showing stronger predictive power for severe toxicities and ICU admission. Higher EASIX and m-EASIX values at early time points were associated with worse overall survival (OS). Furthermore, m-EASIX accurately distinguished CRS from sepsis at symptom onset. Conclusions: m-EASIX is a practical and accessible tool for the early prediction of severe CAR T-cell-related toxicities, risk stratification, and differential diagnosis from sepsis, offering potential to guide clinical decision-making and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.