ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Allo-HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in older adults: similar safety and a viable option compared to younger adults.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Given the increasing number of older patients undergoing allo-HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis, a dedicated evaluation of its safety in this population is warranted. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 353 consecutive patients who underwent first allo-HCT with PTCy between 2014 and 2024. Patients were stratified into three age groups: ≤40 (24.4%), 41-64 (51.8%), and ≥65 (23.8%). Results: Median age was 53 years (range 18-75). Older patients mostly received RIC regimens and matched unrelated donors and younger MAC and haplo-HCT. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred at amedian of 18 and 17 days, without differences among age groups. The incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD at day +100 was 22.4% with no differences according to age ranges (Day +100: 16.3%, 24.0% and 25.0%, P = 0.246) and moderate-severe cGVHD in 7.4%, with incidence significantly lower in patients ≥65 years (2-year: 3.1% vs. 12.1% and 4.8%; P = 0.023). At 2-years, OS rates were 79.5% for ≤40, 73.9% for 41-64, and 57.9% for ≥65 years (P = 0.001). NRM rates were 7.1%, 15.6%, and 16.0% (P = 0.128), and relapse incidence rates were, respectively, 26.2%, 24.6% and 40.7% (P = 0.039). Discussion: Despite higher relapse rates leading to lower OS in older adults, similar NRM and comparable early toxicities support the feasibility of allo-HCT with PTCy in patients ≥65 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.