SynthesisFrontiers in nephrology2025
Lower proteinuria is better for patients with IgA nephropathy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Nefecon in Primary IgA Nephropathy Across Different Baseline Proteinuria Levels: A Real-World Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on microscopic hematuria in IgA nephropathy: a review from the perspective of disease activity biomarkers.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proteinuria is a well-established and recommended biomarker for disease activity in patients with IgAN. In the most recent version of the KDIGO guideline, the target level of proteinuria changed from < 1.0 g/day to < 0.5 g/day. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) is to identify, synthesize, and critically evaluate the evidence from peer-reviewed publications that inform the significance of achieving different proteinuria levels. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase (2005-2025) for studies in adult patients diagnosed with IgAN that examined the relationship between proteinuria measured by any method (e.g., uPCR, 24-hour protein excretion) and key kidney outcomes. The review used an Results: Twenty-one unique studies were included (representing 13,006 patients with IgAN). The studies captured in the SLR were mostly observational and they encompassed diverse patient populations, timing of proteinuria assessment, methods of proteinuria measurement and classification, and clinical management strategies, reflecting real-world heterogeneity in IgAN. Despite the differences in individual study methods, results across studies consistently found that lower proteinuria was associated with better kidney outcomes. Specifically, it was clearly established that <0.5 g/day achieved better outcomes than higher proteinuria thresholds. Conclusion: The evidence identified in this SLR affirms the updated KDIGO recommendation to achieve at least a proteinuria level of < 0.5 g/day. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251062821.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.