ReviewCureus2025
Comparison of Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide for Induction Therapy in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials and Comparative Cohort Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review examines the comparative effectiveness of rituximab and cyclophosphamide for remission induction in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, synthesizing findings from high-quality randomized trials and real-world cohort studies. The available evidence consistently shows that rituximab achieves remission rates comparable to cyclophosphamide in newly diagnosed disease and offers clear advantages in relapsing vasculitis. In patients with organ-threatening disease, including severe renal involvement, both treatments demonstrate similar efficacy, although rituximab provides a more targeted immunologic approach and avoids the cumulative toxicity associated with cyclophosphamide. Long-term follow-up data indicate that remission durability with rituximab is maintained when appropriate maintenance strategies are applied. Observational studies further support rituximab's effectiveness in routine clinical practice, particularly in PR3-ANCA vasculitis and in individuals requiring steroid-sparing regimens. Overall, this review highlights rituximab as a strong and often preferable induction option, offering effective disease control with a more favorable long-term safety profile. These findings reinforce the evolving role of rituximab as a central component of modern therapeutic strategies for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.