ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology
Exploring hyperbaric oxygen therapy for central retinal artery occlusion beyond 24 h: case report.
Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a rare emergency, often affecting individuals over 60, with risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), classified as level IIb by the American Heart Association for CRAO, helps maintain retinal oxygenation during ischemic events by diffusing oxygen through choroidal capillaries. While HBOT appears promising for addressing various vision-threatening conditions, including retinal occlusions and diabetic macular edema, it has not been officially approved for these indications. A 70-year-old male presented with painless vision loss in his right eye, noticed upon waking, accompanied by high blood pressure. On examination, light perception was detected in the right eye, and visual acuity in the left was 0.6. Biomicroscopy revealed CRAO in the right eye, with a cherry-red spot, retinal edema, and absent circulation. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed retinal edema and subretinal fluid. Given that the thrombolysis window had passed, HBOT was initiated within 48 h of presentation. Following the first treatment, the patient experienced improvement in vision, with light perception expanding beyond the peripheral area. CRAO is an ocular emergency, and early treatment is crucial for improving visual outcomes. HBOT, recommended within 6-12 h of diagnosis, has shown promise in restoring vision. In our case, HBOT administered within 48 h led to improved peripheral vision, with the presence of a cherry-red spot on the macula associated with better recovery. While HBOT can have side effects, none were observed here. Despite challenges in conducting large-scale trials, HBOT remains a potentially effective treatment for CRAO, especially if started early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.